The difference between the work and activities of the animal is so simple. Livestock activity is directed on discharge pożądań, while the man is in the opinion of the Hegla – makes the "negation", the work work not self-inflicted, the work of rising above their own greed. Please note the word, which do not yet have died, but should fall-alienation or alienation from.
The man who becomes a stranger to himself. It is natural for Hegla is that in the work of the man becomes a stranger to himself. The work is not sielanką. The man is wyobcowuje. Would not be foreign myself if its work was sielanką, but this is not the case. The word "alienation" is in the positive sense Hegla. Suffering, which is associated with the work is creative, parental. Through work man climbs over each other. Hegel probably does not know, or simply not writes about the negative aspects of the work.
To describe the process of work shall apply the principles of Hegel, dialectic: TESIS, antithesis and synthesis.
Tezą is the man who suffers from greed. Antytezą is towards that is guided by my desire, what do I get it, but my desire is impeded and now fusion, which this is I"m on the one hand, the "I" is "I processed" and, on the other side of the world, which is around me with work.
Let"s to reflection on the concept of labour in Marx. Putting the question on the nature of work at the Marx we get mainly on his "manuscripts of the socio-economic". These manuscripts are the work of which he wrote by having roughly twenty-five years are fragments of his studies in the drop-down under the influence of the situation of human rights in the Hegla then world.
Order primarily on the situation of human wyzyskiwanego. History of "the manuscripts of the socio-economic" is quite interesting. Have been discovered relatively late in 1931/32 and after publication raised huge controversy immediately, so that they do not correspond to the rest of Marx. Appear there some ideas and concepts, which later in the philosophy of Marx"s already there.
Some commentators of this case was the case, that these texts should not be included in the context of the works of Marx, because this writing it was still a committed Marxist, but was heglistą.
The case sparked many discussions, inter alia, in Poland. Involved with those in Poland, asking:
– whether the revolution is possible exploitation of the system, whether or not?
The matter that has brought the book Professor Sprzeczności, which appeared in 1967, but the issue has already been made in some of the work of Leszek Kołakowskiego […].
In short order to refer the matter to the following:
If will take into account the definition of the exploitation of the work of the later works of Marx, it appears the word "alienation", but it is quite the opposite meaning than in philosophy Hegla. In Marx"s concept of wyobcowania is equivalent to, that man is out of his own nature and that may be outside of that fact, that is myself. Such concept wyobcowania assumes that the man has some substance and may be a stranger that indeed, that is to say myself. Marx argues that there are situations at work, when a man becomes foreign myself through the work and as a result of the work. Alienation of work is the result of the exploitation of the work. The Elimination of the exploitation of the work would therefore put an end to exclusion, thereby opening up the way to the harmonious development of man.
With this concept of work and the nature of man are, however, numerous difficulties. For Marx because man is the very essence of the material, and what is the matter in terms of Marx?
However, the word matter is in the material. Materia is the basic material. The man is so plastic-for work. Work makes man man.
We have here under similar to Hegla, but at the same time we get to an important difference:
u Hegla plastic was the spirit of, here with is matter. The work can create man in the right or the wrong direction. The work "fraudulent" kills man, working the "correct" or otherwise "triggered" creates a genuine man.
But which determines the nature of the work?
Depends on work, i.e. from the regime of social work. Put simply: tell me what system you are working, and I"ll tell you man.
This involves the idea of exclusion. Alienation is something clearly negative. It is the name for the exploitation of the system, which destroys human. Working wyalienowana is the work of the foreign nature of man, but the view of Marx is not quite coherent logically. On the one hand it is claimed that the man is plastic and plastic-only, and on the other hand, it is considered that the man has a essence, nature, because if it had no merits, it would not be of exclusion – and so the question arises:
-How is alienation?
And here we get n barrier in recognition of his philosophical works of Marx for mature.
Janek Kruczalak
